COVID VACCINE SCANDALS: "God-Hesitant" Promoters of Immoral Covid Vaccines Trot Out Fresh Slang; Instead of Pushing Ethical, Proper Covid Vaccines, They Simply Trudge Along with Incoherent Media Campaign, Morbid Public Grooming Process

There is some fresh fake-slang "greasing" the latest PR wave behind the immoral U.S. covid vaccines.

Mainstream Americans with normail moral standards, applying prudent fact-based, ethical judgment, are being defamed as "vaccine-hesitant."

It sounds as if, instead, the purveyors of unethical vaccines are "God-hesitant."

Purveyors of immoral vaccines also are probably a bit "science-hesitant," given that, from the standpoint of medical science, there literally was absolutely no reason to limit vaccine types to an unethical subset of vaccines insdisputably associated with evil.

Regarding the association with evil, the only would-be arguments attempted in defense of the unethical vaccines seem to be over timing and degree.

Meanwhile, the implied prohibition against vaccines that are actually ethical and usable, in addition to being unnecessary, has undeniably and artificially suppressed vaccination rates and needlessly prolonged covid.

The slander or libel of the fake-slang term "vaccine-hesitant" seems to persist regardless of how unsubstantiated and defamatory such fake-speech might be.

Like a bad customer support staffer whose company has made a mistake, its promoters apparently seek to dodge the issue, and perhaps seek some kind of domineering upper-hand, by trying to change the subject. That is, encountering a prudent individual citing facts and requirements, demanding they fix their problems, they try to shift the focus. The manipulator might try to shift away from facts, and away from their own failures and dishonesty, and instead presume to fantasize about the emotional state of the prudent individual who demanded action. Perhaps the manipulator might, in the guise of being "understanding," become patronizing about the prudent individual experience "frustration" or "concern."

In the case of the immoral subset of covid vaccines, the propaganda artists are fantasizing that the prudent mainstream Americans with good judgment and proper moral standards are simply "hesitant."

Yet what about the hesitancy of those pushing the unethical covid vaccines, to address their incompetence and shameful sinfulness? There are centuries of empirical observation over how there can be more than a certain hesitation on the part of persons lost and confused amidst sin.

The obvious question is, with their minds clouded by sin, and their judgment tainted by potential damnation, are the promoters of the morally illicit vaccines "God-hesitant?"

Are they timid about coming back to God? Sometimes, when sinners are still in the grip of particular sins, they are not simply needing to break an addiction. They are timid at facing the reality of their sin, timid about facing their guilt and shame and timid about facing God Himself.

Unfortunately, of course, time on earth is limited, at least in the current age, meaning that time is very limited for those trying to avoid God. Eventually we all come before the Awesome Tribunal, when each of us must be judged according to our deeds. At some point, we all must face God.

Naturally it is much better to try to face up to reality now, and try to reform and make good. Yet it can be difficult to "snap back to reality."

That is one reason that some Confessors or Ministers try to hard to adapt a humble, welcoming manner, like the father of the Prodigal Son who was deeply moved at the sight of the sinful son wanting to return home, and sought to welcome the Prodigal Son back to a better life. Keep in mind, of course, that action was precipitated, in part, by the Prodigal Son declaring his repentance and desire for a new life, no matter how humbling, including his denunciation of his past sinful errors.

Perhaps the unscientific, unethical, yet domineering and manipulative, purveyors of the morally illicit vaccines are not ready to come back. Or perhaps they simply are afraid to face their own guilt and shame.

It is undisputed that publicly available U.S. covid vaccines are associated with evil.

The only arguments are over timing and degree.

For example, there might be vain attempts at arguments over how much time has passed since the murders occurred. Or there might be arguments over how many times a prenatal murder victim's tissues had their cells replicated outside the murder victim's body, instead of inside the murder victim's body.

There also are questions over which parts of the vaccine process are implicated. That is, issues are raised over whether the most direct connections to prenatal murder are in the actual final substance of the vaccine being injected; aspects of the production process; during a developmental or testing process; or some combination of more than. Indeed, those shades of distinctions also fuel another manipulative tactic, to change the subject to something upon which the manipulator thinks they stand on more solid ground.

By comparison, imagine if Al Capone were accused of murder, racketeering, dealing in an illegal substance, tax evasion, cannibalism and smuggling pandas. Imagine, next, if it came out that it there was nothing connecting Al Capone to cannibalism or pandas, so that a newspaper sympathetic to Al Capone blasted a headline reading, "Al Capone Exonerated." Perhaps the article would belabor, at length, how Capone proved he had nothing to do with cannibalism or panda bears, but simply leave out any references the rest of the matter, about murder, racketeering, substance-dealing and tax evasion.

Similarly, if a given vaccine is associated most closely with evil in the development or production phase, perhaps there might be a screaming headline arguing something like, "Myth Busted: No Prenatal Tissue In Vaccine Shot," trying to water down any attention being paid to the rest of the facts. Such a vaccine still would be associated with evil, and with other uses for human fetal cell lines.

There was a bizarre, if not potentially diabolical, overlap between immoral covid vaccines and the abuse scandal in a major religious denomination. An independent, voluminous grand jury report uncovered that fact that a sitting Bishop had knowingly harbored a known past child molester, providing for his upkeep, while apparently keeping the abuse a secret from the public. The claim was that the child molester was then older and infirmed, hopefully no longer able to pose a threat if harbored and sequestered. A later report indicated that the Bishop did inform some police privately, perhaps knowing that nothing would come from it, given the passage of time.

Higher-up religous officials also were implicated, including claims that a key committee, on a global level, approved of the handling of the matter, including the secrecy. The Bishop's superior even made him a Bishop in yet another city.

Later, however, a separate matter was raised, accusing the Bishop in question of himself being an abuser. When the timing and other details were investigated, it turned out that the Bishop could not have, himself, been involved, in the other abuse, as specified. Yet he, and his superiors or colleageus, still were more than culpable for their wrongdoing of harboring the allegedly informed child molester and concealing it from the Faithful.

Nevertheless there still were efforts to declare, in a misleading manner, that the Bishop had been "exonerated." The modus operandi was to focus solely on the one charge, trumpet his being freed from that accusation, and steadfastly avoid the fact that the Bishop had most certainly not been exonerated for his other blameworthy misconduct relating to the abuse scandal.

That same Bishop later became one of the "Covid Bishops," indeed putting his name as a main author on what amounted to somewhat clumsy earthly argument, pushing the limits of credibility, argyuing in favor of immoral covid vaccines being morally permissible. The argument essentially was a somewhat superficial lesser-of-two-evils argument. It completely overlooked the serious sin of omission of the Bishop's religious denomination failing to develop, or seriously call for, ethical, usable vaccines, despite tremendous arrays of wealth, universities, hospital systems or even their high-profile status as public communicators.

Curiously enough, even the problematic statement signed by the Covid Bishop in question openly declared the illicit covid vaccines to be evil, and arguably should be read as simply carving out some kind of exemption to engage in evil, only if done under protest. Yet very few, including the Covid Bishops themselves, seem to have used the illicit vaccines under much protest. Instead, just as so-called "Vatican II" could be easily misapplied in the wrong hands, the entire seems to have been reduced to some kind of generic "go-ahead" and nothing else.

An even bigger problem for figures such as the Covid Bishops is that, as well-established by the Gospel and other Apostolic Holy Scripture, one can indeed, sadly and tragically, go to hell solely for an omission, or simply associating with evil, even when doing so under coercion.

The rich man went to hell simply for enjoying a fat life while Lazarus lay at his gate. There was no indication in Scripture that he ever attacked Lazarus, or even insulted him. The rich man simply failed to act, while finding ways to enjoy his day and, presumably, to get rich. Yet he still suffered eternal damnation.

Saint John the Apostle warned that people bearing an economic passport associated with evil would also suffere eternal damnation. He did not indicate that those people even engaged in any other evil acts themselves. There was an evil figure, he wanted people to bear a mark associating themselves with the evil figure, perhaps denoting allegiance of some kind, and wanted people to be shut out of the economy if they did not.

Even if they otherwise avoided other evil acts, they still were detined for hell. That the allegiance was coerced, that they would be shut out off the economy otherwise, apparently was no excuse.

The Covid Bishops' denomination, and others, have access to almost unimaginable amounts of wealth. They have extensive arrays of hospitals and medical facilities, as well as universities, including research universities and universities with medical schools. The Covid Bishops therefore risk being found guilty of a mortal sin of omission of a staggering scale, for failing to prompt, or even sufficiently call for, ethical, usable covid vaccines.

An added concern would be whether homicide by omission would bring automatic excommunication. Yet the biggest focus in human life, and in the Gospels, of course, is Eternal Life versus being cast upon Gehenna and the fires of eternal damnation.

Use of Immoral Methods for Covid Vaccines Was Absolutely Unnecessary

Just as it is indisputable that the publicly available U.S. covid vaccines are associated with evil, it also is indisputable that the use of immoral methods was absolutely unnecessary.

It is scientifically indisputable that moral and ethical alternatives exist. Other mammalian sources could be used, such as COS7 cells.

Yet, two years into the covid pandemic, the net effect is that there seems to have been a concerted effort, by the Trump administration, Biden regime, federal bureaucrats, universities, and big-money "health care" to strenuously avoid ethical, proper vaccines.

They seem bent on essentially giving a monopoly to evil.

It might be akin to taking over all agricultural lands and meat production; making sure the only crops and meat available were grown with slave labor, fertilized by the bodies of executed political dissidents, or even partly cannibalistic; then mounting a huge PR campaign promoting "nutrition."

Imagine Caligula saying that Christians who refused to eat meat sacrificed to pagan idols were "nutrition-hesitant." Consider a tribe of cannibals saying that a civilized person refusing to eat human flesh taken from murdered captives was "anti-nutrition." Imagine Nazi doctors, making an experimental drug using tissue stolen from a Jewish medical colleague kidnapped and murdered in a concentration camp, then launching a PR campaign, with the Nazi doctors trying to argue that anyone objecting to the Holocaust-connected project was "anti-science."

Add to that the undeniable fact that there have been some number of people dying after getting what are still essentially experimental covid vaccines, irregardless of whatever bureaucratic window-dressing is applied.

Those same bureaucrats, after all, are associated with the same agencies that helped conjure up the immoral scenario itself to begin with. And those agencies sometimes have committees that include persons from institutions, such as universities, that have been implicated in human rights violations such as abortion or experiments using human embryos.

Unfortunately for them, there also appears to be a kind of "Covid Vaccine Six Degrees of Separation" issue.

Too many people know somebody, who knows somebody, whether a relative, friend or colleage, within however many "degrees," who had a bad reaction or dropped dead after the covid vaccine.

Meanwhile, mainstream Americans with normal moral standards have patiently gathered facts in a rational manner, exercised prudent judgment, and rejected the current scenario.

That rejection, of course, is hardly a rejection of vaccines, or covid vaccines. It constitutes an implict demand to get the job done right, for the first time, having failed miserably thus far.

Whether it is an immoral subset of covid vaccines or any other evil, no evil can truly exist without lies and manipulation.

Coming up with fake slang and made-up catchphrases is "par for the course," for adolescent PR campaigns as well as dictators and other bullies and abusers.

After "painting people into a corner" the immoral-covid-vaccine fetish crowd has attempted to present association with evil as a fait accompli, and as something good. They seek to paint avoidance of evil, avoidance of the deliberately evil scenario they concocted, as itself blameworthy. The immoral-covid-vaccine fetish crowd even adopts the delusional, fraudulent stance that years of objections to their immorality did not exist, that voices of reason demanding something appropriate never actually said anything.

Their morbid public grooming campaign would be worthy of a drug dealer or child molester, given its relentless effort to wear down and beat back rational, ethical objections.

There used to be public interest television commercials warning children and parents that, when a drug dealer tried to get children to experiment with drugs, one of their tactics would be to taunt a child by saying, "are you AFRAAAID??" In other words, if a child said no, for rational and ethical reasons, that illegal drugs were immoral, dangerous, deadly, brain-destroying, bringing financial ruin, instigating other crimes, and all the rest, the drug dealer would try to pretend none of that existed, and try change the subject to the child's emotional state, taunting them about whether they were afraid of something.

Similarly, those with immoral-covid-vaccine mania seem bent on ignoring the science and thousands of years of ethics, to change the subject to the mainstream American's emotional state, saying, oh, they must just be "hesitant."

Because child molestation is evil, psychopathic, harmful, dangerous, life-ruining, and stupid, even children have the good sense to realize it is something to reject and avoid. The public cliche about child molesters, reported in news stories, is that they, therefore, sometimes employ a grooming process seeking to relentlessly wear down and beat back the rational judgment and instinctive good conscience of their target. They apparent

The relentless morbid public grooming process pushing the immoral subset of covid vaccines, the only types being allowed in the United States, also has been a relentless process of attempting to avoid facts, side-step rational argument, beat down rational objections and beat down the good conscience of main stream Americans.

The manipulation also is reiminscent of cliches associated with rapists. A rapist is sometimes depicted as promising the victim whom they are attacking that, "you will thank me afterwards," as if to try to convince the rape victim that being raped is "for your own good." Now, given that rape can potentially destroy the mind and life of the attack victim, perhaps the rapist is not simply a delusional, violent criminal psychopath. Perhaps such a rapist would also be hoping to destroy the mind of the rape victim with psychiatric damage, to weaken their mental capacity to take decisive action after the fact to address the crime afterwards.

There is a whiff of the rapist mentality in the conjuring up of the "vaccine-hesitant" label.

There is the hint of a delusion that mainstream Americans with normal moral standards, exercising rational, prudent judgment to reject something incompetent and immoral, are somehow just experiencing some kind of emotional "blip," that coercing them into submissive participation in evil is "for their own good."

By curious coincidence, Joe Biden himself has been implicated in accusations about invading woman's personal space, or engaging in various unwanted touching and physical contact, with no warning or no advance consent.

He demonstrated a similar mentality even when he forced a left-wing network, owned by a left-wing cable company, to cut into the Notre Dame-Clemson football game, for no reason other than to inflict himself on the sensibilities of people who mostly wanted nothing to do with him. (That is, if no game had been game on, it is undoubtedly the case that Biden would have spoken a few hours earlier, in the late afternoon. One surmises that the only reason he spoke when he did was to cut off the football broadcast, force himself upon people, and punish people who were likely to oppose him. Then there was the transparently manipulative, plausible-deniabity gimmick of pretending it was important, and that those missing the game should not complain or risk being deemed bad citizens if they did. That false argument would have been belied by the fact that, if it was important, and done on a Saturday, in any other instance it would have been done in the late-afternoon, not on a Saturday night.)

There even have been strange reports of Biden inflicting himself verbally upon what reportedly appeared to be younger teen girls, and the sensibilities of their parents, with strange remarks.

Trump, Biden, and others are all to blame for the lack of ethical, usable covid vaccines in the United States. Yet, for Biden, his persona seems to lend itself even moreso to the attempt at a morbid public grooming process. That includes Biden, and others, pretending that the host of objections do not exist, and that people can speak rationally "until the cows come home" and he and others of his ilk will just keep pretending nothing was said.

Like the Nazis before them, are they trying to kill off people who are better than they are?

There is a kind of Covid Apartheid being concocted. Mainstream Americans of normal morals are being threatened with the loss of employment, or even life-saving health care, if they fail to participate in evil via the unethical covid vaccines.

Moreover, the same mainstream Americans might feel under pressure not to move or travel, or even live the home very often, because they are being placed under threat by the lack of a usable, ethical vaccine, even while the unethically vaccinated can place them at risk by acting as Typhoid Mary's.

The unethical vaccines are less than 90% effective, do not prevent picking up the virus itself, and leave a better than 1 in 10 chance of developing the illness. Some vaccinated persons even die.

Meanwhile, unethical-vaccine mania is emboldening unsound behavior that threatens public health, such as reckless abandonment of more stringent safeguards or an amplification of the same dim-witted false bravado that was practiced even at the height of lockdowns, or, for that matter, during past cold and flu seasons, by person sneering at good public health practices.

What of unethical covid vaccines and what Saint John the Apostle described as the "Mark of the Beast?"

Interestingly, the actual "Mark of the Beast" described by Saint John the Apostle was an economic passport.

It was a short-hand symbol or denotation declaring association with evil by way of allegiance to an evil figure. Yet the functionality of it was two-fold.

First, only those who had it were allowed to participate in the economy, such as by buying or selling goods, while those who refused were banished from the economy.

Second, those who temporarily lived in comfort, by getting the Mark of the Beast and enjoying economic activity, were later damned for all time. After the return of the Son of God and the Final Judgment, their decision was permanently one bringing perdition.

The whole point of a vaccine in the first place is to instigate the body's immune system into the same result as surving an illness, namely to develop antibodies similar to what a survivor develops by virtue of battling and prevailing over a disease itself.

The seeming obsession with the unethical vaccines seems confirmed by entities, whether institutions or Covid Judges, seems confirmed by their steadfast refusal to comprehend science and human physiology, by often refusing to acknowledge that a covid survivor already has gained the same, or better, immunity than what the unethical vaccines would offer.

That fact calls into question not only the competence but the motives of such malefactors. One surmises that they care more about attacking the conscience and coercing association with evil than with fighting or ending covid.

The forced absence of ethical, usable covid vaccines also means an artificial suppression of vaccinations. As such, the motivations of those pushing the immoral vaccines is in doubt. They seem arguably much more interested in harming and undermining normal mainstream Americans with higher moral standards, than they do in actually bringing covid to an end.

As such, they are an obstacle to efforts to end the pandemic.

Indeed, there is a snowballing effect from efforts by unethical-covid-vaccine promoters undermining the fight against covid. For example, if health care professionals leave health care in droves to avoid a so-called "covid vaccine mandate," that is actually nothing other than a mandate to use a limited subset of immoral vaccines, that ripple effect also could endanger lives.

There could even be additional snowballing of human rights violations, such as using the resulting artificial health care shortage as an excuse to engage in so-called health care "rationing," murder by omission through denial of care.

In other words, if proper, ethical, usable covid vaccines were developed, a mainstream American with normal moral standards by avoid covid, or have reduced symptoms. But because of the anti-American, anti-God stance being taken, that same American might end up catching covid from a "Typhid Mary" who received an illicit vaccine, waltzed around at stores and major events without a mask, and infected the normal American. Typhoid Mary might die despite being vaccinated, but also might simply live, while the Normal American ends up dying on a sidewalk because the hospital had no more room, because everybody quit, because Trump, Biden, Fauci and certain major religions failed to develop normal, ethical vaccines.

Or, the normal American might be brought in, then murdered by omission if the hospital decides days later that "nothing more can be done," regardless of whether they have any actual idea of the a longer stay on articial respiration would actually result in them bouncing back. Or perhaps someone will push the idea of suicide-by-omission, asking someone delirious with fever to sign something agreeing to be denied care if certain major organs stop.

It is time to take care of covid by developing ethical, usable vaccines.

Under the rubric of "lead, follow, or get out of the way," that means taking action to develop the right kinds of vaccines, and possibly shoving aside those who have concocted the current scenario.

Such malefactors do not belong in health care, politics, the legal system, universities, big business, military leadership or any other setting where they can cause this kind of damage.

[please be sure to consider clicking the support button, to support this web project and related efforts]

Key Words: Covid-19, Coronavirus, Covid Vaccines, Unethical

Covid-19