ABORTION SCANDALS: "Notre Dame" Football vs. Wisconsin Should Be Boycotted Over University of Wisconsin's Abortion Ties and Attempts to Side-Step Law
Mainstream Americans of normal moral standards should boycott the Notre Dame-Wisconsin football game over abortion, the deliberate, cold-blooded killing of defenseless human individuals, and urge further action against "Notre Dame" and Wisconsin if they fail to fire those most responsible.
Like a luxury mansion that turns out to be infested by rodents, vermine and toxic molds, "Notre Dame's" football schedule continutes to sound superficially glitzy, at least by old standards, but instead it is scarred and peppered with troubled institutions that either hold themselves out as performing abortions, or otherwise find ways to connect themselves to prenatal killing.
"Notre Dame" still tries to cash in on "branding" of a "Catholic" nature, even to the point that their sports marketing will attempt to cite an old engraving on a campus church listing "God, Country, Notre Dame." Yet, like other forms of homicide, Catholic church law regards abortion with such seriousness that procurement of abortion brings automatic excommunication.
The University of Wisconsin is attempting to side-step Wisconsin law, which actually bans state funding being used for abortion, with university officials instead having the university formally and systemically associate with the country's largest chain of abortion providers, so-called "Planned Parenthood."
They do so, not simply in terms of accessing or lending personnel in connection with the cold-blooded, deliberate termination of human individuals. They even have made it a formal component of the university medical school's obstretics and gynecology residency program.
Even worse, university officials, such as the medical school dean, acting under his university title, have publically advocated for a continuation of the practice, even arguing against legislative clarifications of the law to specifically bar their misconduct.
The university has failed to fire the individual, or to expel medical residents or faculty associating with abortion. One of their websites even lists another medical faculty member as being connected with the would-be research institute for the nation's biggest abortion perpetrator, and being a would-be expert on such things. In the University of Wisconsin's case, the evil of prenatal killing, predictably, also has been associated with diabolical cunning and manipulations at purporting to seek a way "around" the law.
Given that ongoing track record, It obviously was both incompetent and improper for "Notre Dame" officials to agree to associate with the University of Wisconsin, when that troubled university itself was associating with something so horrific, unsavory, and evil. That is the case for joining the Big Ten conference in hockey, and it definitely is the case for agreeing, for no reason whatsoever, to enhance and legitimize Wisconsin's revenue and would-be prestige by voluntarily scheduling a football game against the troubled institution.
The savage, murderous human rights abuse, and child abuse, of abortions has taken an almost unimaginable scale. Since the Roe v. Wade decree seeking to block criminal prosecutions for prenatal killings already criminalized on the books, so-called "surgical" abortion, alone, has killed off almost as many Americans as the number of votes needed to win the the presidency.
There also is a decided racial component. Regardless of whatever demographic breakdowns exist in Wisconsin, nationwide abortion has been an anti-Black genocide, with a racist impact killing off Blacks at a rate several times that of whites, per unit of population.
The racial component is even more notable given the racial imbalance, and implied racial exploitation, associated with football as a sport. While "Notre Dame's" student body has a percentage of Blacks far below the national makeup of the general population, their football team often appears to be roughly two-thirds Black. So any negative aspects of football, such as the physical toil, the brain injuries and other injuries, and other costs, also would fall disproportionately upon Blacks.
Given that more Blacks likely have been killed by abortion than the total number of Black slaves at the start of the civil war, it is especially objectionable to ask a statistically Black-dominated sports team to compete with an institution attempting to bypass its own governing laws to associate itself with abortion.
Additionally unsavory are attempts by persons such as the Wisconsin medical school dean to argue that the pathetic failure by persons like himself to purge and remedy errors in accrediting bodies, that apparently also got infiltrated by pro-abortion impostors, as an excuse to simply perpetuate his own moral failures and astonishing lack of leadership.
For would-be "Notre Dame" officials, there is a danger of further disgracing themselves for their own abortion connections, however indirect, and their lack of a proper moral compass, and lack of leadership or competence. "Notre Dame" officials already have disgraced themselves by defying the Faith by honoring, or even hiring, pro-abortion politicians (in at least one case also hiring a pro-abortion politician who also was a militant proponent of the ideology of sodomism).
A "Notre Dame" Heisman winner, who also was disgraced and suspended by the NFL for gambling, is taken as implying or openly admitting that he was complicit, during his time at Notre Dame, in one of his girlfriends getting an abortion after he got her pregnant out of wedlock. "Notre Dame" should have disavowed the perpetrator and given back any copy of his Heisman Trophy, and they should have avoided honoring him in any way. Instead, they invited him to speak at a pep rally (where his pants fell down at the podium) and apparently featured him on a football program cover.
Meanwhile, there are the abortion-connected covid vaccine scandals. "Notre Dame" has now acted to turn any future "Notre Dame" degree or professional experience at the university into something tainted and unsavory, given their attempts to coerce association with evil in the form of unethical covid vaccines.
Their misconduct comes against a context where government, health care, and would-be "research institutions" like "Notre Dame" itself, apparently have deliberately avoided developing, or even urging the creation of, ethical covid vaccines. Now "Notre Dame" is attempting to force association with evil by forcing involvement with covid vaccines that are associated with evil, completely unecessarily.
That the existing, approved U.S. vaccines are associated with evil is indisputable. The only argument is over timing, and the numbers of steps involved with various processes, i.e., how many years passed since tissue was first stolen from murder victims without their consent, how many cells were replicated outside of the murder victims' bodies, which part(s) of the vaccine development process was most implicated, and so forth.
All that comes against another indisputable fact, that scientifically it apparently was absolutely unnecessary to limit vaccines to the unethical variety, yet "Notre Dame" officials carefully avoid mention of that fact or their own failures when essentially defrauding by omission and contributing to a morbid public grooming process aimed at complacency with evil.
Meanwhile, one seems the same modus operandi at work across multiple levels of attempted public grooming and manipulations. One is to deliberately fail to create proper alternatives, then present association with evil as the only alternative, then participate in that dynamic being perpetuated.
With the unethical covid vaccines, there was a quiet avoidance of ethical vaccines for nearly two years, including during nearly a full year of objections over the fact, followed an effort to present the unethical versions as "the only game in town," with no indication whatsoever of a departure from wallowing in that evil inertia.
With pro-abortion accredidation of medical residencies, there was infiltration of the troubled, supposed accrediting body, and the false declarations, and diabolically false practicality of that being "the only game in town." All that, of course, has been followed by no apparent move whatsoever to reform and remedy the supposed accrediting body, however obvious and glaring the need, no matter how academically and morally psychopathic their position on abortion.
Mainstream Americans of normal moral standards, the vast majority of the country, have no choice but to simply ignore "Notre Dame" football games against troubled institutions like Wisconsin, Southen Cal, Stanford, Pitt, Miami, the ACC, the Big Ten, or any others associating themselves with abortion, directly or indirectly.
"Notre Dame" itself probably needs to apologize, and fire or otherwise discipline any school official associated with such incompetence and failed leadership.
Such a boycott probably should be widened to broader efforts to avoid unecessary spending on things such as merchandising, or even to avoid "clicks" that would enhance web data and web-related revenue, such as advertising revenue for marketing and media efforts associated with the morally problematic endeavors.
[please be sure to consider clicking the support button, to support this web project and related efforts]
Key Words: Notre Dame, Notre Dame Football, Brian Kelly, NCAA, Scandals, Ethics, Catholic
Any health-related, legal, scientific, investment- or business-related, or other content provided on these site(s) or domain(s) is for informational purposes only, and/or to invite further reflection, research and analysis, and not for the purpose of providing medical, legal or any other kind of professional advice. All investment activity can carry risk, and these sites and domains assert no opionion or guidance regarding any investor's undertaking of any investment decision. Under no circumstances do these sites or domain(s), establish an attorney-client relationship or any similar or analogous type of relationship, professional or otherwise. Use of these site(s) and domain(s) is only permitted under, and constitutes agreement with, those or similar conditions and limitations, as expressed now, or as might be revised in the future.