---

Election Fraud? Biden Election Numbers Do Not Add Up, Sound Implausible; Alleged Election "Results" Likely Not Certifiable Under Present Circumstances, and Biden Lacks a Clear Path to Lawful Power

(Steve Welsh - SCW 11.10.20) President Donald Trump's 2020 election numbers were so enormously successful that the only way Biden supporters can allege victory is with hyperinflated Biden numbers, so cartoonish as to require unrealistic claims of "voter turnout," of more than 98% of the number all registered voters as measured just two years ago in 2018.

That fact alone is enough to "flag" the alleged results and prevent certification, to halt any lawful path to power for a would-be Biden regime.

One practical step would be to treat election fraud like any other federal crime, or various forms of political terrorism, by offering substantial cash rewards, and immunity or leniency for these or other crimes, to induce informants to come forward with tips, confessions, evidence and leads, even if just to "connect the dots" about any relevant logistics. Who would the informants be? Would they be hackers, political insiders, persons actually handling election-related documents or machinery, or janitors accidentally overhearing something from a hallway? Who knows.

In foreign countries reputed to habitually have rigged, fraudulent elections, there might be a smattering of "smoking guns" or localized eyewitness accounts, such as a random amateur video in Russia of an opposition member suddenly getting sucker-punched in a polling place by a seemingly obscure passerby. Yet what often ends up exposing the matter are implausible numbers that jump out as unrealistic. Perhaps carelessness by the fraudsters themselves results in blocks of numbers, perhaps from diverse locales, that jump out as red flags when examined by third parties or math experts, perhaps cross-referenced with other known figures about voters or population.

Even troubled Biden supporters seem forced to admit that Trump was wildly successful in the 2020 election, that Trump got more votes than any other presidential candidate prior to 2020, now approaching 72 million votes for Trump, and still counting.

That 72 million for Trump nearly overwhelms the almost 66 million for Hillary Rodham Clinton, and roughly 63 million for Trump himself, just four years ago in 2016.

The problem for Biden supporters is that, in that context, the only way to allege Biden victory is to hyperinflate Biden's numbers to something now allegedly well over 76 million. In current times, that figure is so cartoonish and unrealistic that it would require total votes approaching nearly 100% of all registered voters as measured just two years ago.

Right now, for those numbers to "add up" would require total votes of nearly 151 million in 2020. In 2018, according to different sources, the total number of all registered voters was only around 153 million.

While it is true that numbers of registered voters can vary, it also is true that states such as Wisconsin, which earned scrutiny for unusual claims about numbers and turnout, claim the "right" to refuse to provide updated numbers about registrations until mid-December or later.

In other words, enough is already is now known to flag the election "results" as implausible and implying mischief of a mind-boggling magnitude. More precise numbers are being concealed and sandbagged, accompanied by nonchalant calls for submissive acceptance of the implausible.

Meanwhile, there might be breezy, quiet mentions by left-leaning "media" articles of a different "turnout" figure, still quite high, but not 98%. Such articles might try to avoid mentioning registered voter turnout in favor of redefining voter turnout by total population, perhaps total population over 18. The failure of those sources to cover all the facts, to quietly and breezily avoid the numbers cited above, and the quiet nonchalance with which the articles "keep moving along" after the subtle manipulation, hint at the problematic nature of those texts. The phenomenon also reveals those sources' growing lack of usefulness, bad reporting, and implications about the motives of those who took over those logos and branding of what used to be news sources.

There also are a few added twists to the numbers that are interesting, first and foremost the buffers that any hypothetical fraudsters would have leaving themselves. The numbers are just a bit less than 100% of the total registrations number from two years ago, undoubtedly also having some kind of buffer below 100% of whatever the current mystery number of current registrations might turn out to be. Had they actually exceeded 100%, that would have been even more damning, of course, if that were possible.

Then there is the curious buffer between the alleged Biden numbers and the Trump numbers.

Had Biden been attributed a more realistic differential, with a closer margin, in the announced "results," that would have highlighted the pressing need to reassess the results. By giving Biden a bigger buffer, a more comfortable 4- to 5-million-vote lead, perhaps there would invite arguments that, even if fraud existed, it would not be enough to make a difference.

Unfortunately for Biden, a more comfortable margin also looks more cartoonish, when placed above the otherwise most successful candidate in history. With Trump getting roughly 72 million, a supposedly comfortable 4-plus million lead for Biden looks all the more unrealistic and cartoonish, to go along with the unrealistic 76 million, which in turn makes the required, implied total numbers of voters all the more implausible.

It is almost as if somebody got so caught up in the cartoonish fantasy that they did not realize that they would be giving themselves away with numbers so outlandish.

Many practical questions remain, including how best to iron out the apparently unreliable election results.

One overarching historical fact that jumps out is that Richard Nixon was wrong in his decision to avoid contesting the 1960 election results because a still-young Nixon, still in his forties, claimed such a process might be too disruptive or demoralizing for the nation. In the aftermath of submissively accepting the questionable 1960 electoral "results," the nation, instead, saw the 1960s and 1970s become a time of near-nuclear war and near-World War III with the Cuban Missile Crisis, social unrest, assassinations, the Vietnam War, growing drug use, the so-called Sexual Revolution, eventual Abortionism, a disastrous Lyndon Johnson presidency, and other tumultuousness.

One of many good starting points for the 2020 election scandal would be to treat election fraud like any other federal crime, or like any form of terrorism, by offering large cash rewards to informants, or by offering immunity, leniency for prosecutions of these or other crimes, and other incentives, for persons coming forward as informants.

Another point to consider is whether to do the equivalent of "going after Al Capone for tax evasion." The apparent likelihood that any Biden "victory" is false could, and should motivate, to aggressively pursue any other actions that, even by themselves, would rightly block a Biden regime from power.

That would be the case regardless whether Biden ever hypothetically had turned out to "know where the bodies are buried," to use an idiomatic expression, or every hypothetically were to do the election fraud equivalent of saying "will no one rid me of this meddlesome Priest."

For example, there is a federal statue that blocks anyone guilty of treason from holding any U.S. office. If disgraced Hunter Biden's business dealings with China did, indeed, implicate Joe Biden, in ways that somehow amounted to treason, that fact arguably also could settle the matter of blocking Biden from illegally taking power. If it was illegal to take power through hypothetical election fraud, it also would be illegal to take power after violating that statute.

Perhaps there is a court that could expedite a treason prosecution. Undoubtedly there would be those trying to argue that such a prosecution was politically motivated, yet if it turned out that the the facts exist, they would exist.

There also is the curiously cynical reality that the Trump impeachment was an attempt to place Joe Biden above the law. Joe Biden, as a sitting vice president, tried to bully a weaker country into firing a foreign prosecutor investigating a company connected to Biden's disgraced son Hunter Biden. That was an obvious conflict of interest, abuse of power and act of personal corruption by Joe Biden, as well as an un-American bullying of a weaker country.

Trump sought to assure that weaker country that the United States, under new leadership, did not approve of such abusive misconduct, and that the United States would welcome any concerns the weaker country had about the matter, and any relevant evidence to help them address the matter. It was openly and with direct focus that Biden's allies sought to punish Trump through the constitutional mechanism of impeachment, for Trump subjecting Biden to accountability. The impeachment of Trump specifically manifested pressure to try to place Joe Biden above the law.

The Biden-ally impeachment of Trump was, itself, therefore a cynical kind of obstruction of justice and anti-whistleblower retaliation that sought to punish Trump for doing the right thing, when Trump was attempting to address abusive wrongs by a U.S. vice president during the vice president's tenure and under color of the vice president's federal office.

Presumably the same Biden allies would seek to prevent the necessary impeachment of Biden for his acts that Trump had tried to address, or for other problematic conduct.

Then there is the widespread domestic treason of Biden connecting himself with the mass murder of 62 million Americans in their mother's wombs by surgical abortion alone, and the added issue of what that means for whether Biden is even capable of forming a legitimate government in a democracy. It would be like Hitler murdering 10 million people in the Nazi holocaust, getting 10 million votes, having another 10 million people vote against him, then claiming he was a duly elected leader of a democracy.

At present, the task at hand is to address likely electoral abuse and prevent any illegal taking of power in the first place. One step forward would be to offer financial rewards and other inducements to informants for leads, or even direct evidence and confessions, as part of the most robust investigation in U.S. history. The validity of American government depends upon it.

If Biden and his allies succeed in continuing to obstruct justice and impede exposure of facts, and if a Biden regime actually managed to seize nominal power, Trump would do well to follow the lead of Andrew Jackson, after Jackson felt he was robbed of the presidency by John Quincy Adams.

For the next four years, Jackson reputedly set out to become an unrelenting, powerful gadfly impeding Adams from doing anything to exercise what Jackson considered ill-gotten powers. Then Jackson ran again to unseat Adams.

In the meantime, Trump also would do well to establish a media empire that dwarfs, for example, CNN or the Comcast-owned NBC that cut away from Trump's efforts to address the election, in their attempt to censor the leader of the free world.

The author of this article has no opinion to offer on whether Trump should be elected in 2024, although Biden, for his part, lost Biden's credibility to be President back in the 1980s. And it appears highly unlikely that Biden could have won the election in 2020, or that the numbers alleging he did have credibility.

Key Words: Election, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Politics, 2020 Election, Election Fraud, Voters, Registered Voters, Nixon, Kennedy, 1960 Election